It has also been contended that learned Trial Court after appreciating the evidence, material on record, has recorded a finding that has given the entire property to Defendant No. 1 as gift, therefore, he is sole owner of the suit property and he is in possession of the said property. The suit filed was dismissed on 23.8.1973, Page 8 of 42 against which an appeal was preferred and same is also dismissed on 26.2.1977, against that second appeal was preferred but during pendency of the appeal, therefore, legal representatives were not brought on record, as such, the Second Appeal No. 331 of 1977 was dismissed as abated. Facts pleaded by the defendant have been denied with regard to title and owner of the suit property. It has been contended that the Defendant No.1 in all the civil suits was representing and all the documents were produced by him through his signature. It has been also contended that everybody is aware of the fact that the Defendant No. 1 was kept since his childhood, all the lands have been given to him as gift, therefore, nobody has right over the suit property. I
| Test Type | PAID |
|---|---|
| Total Words | 511 Words |
| Words Per Minutes | 120 WPM |
| Time | 25 min |
Why Steno Architect Certification Training
Take the first step!
Kailash Chandra Vol. 21
Legal Dictations