Per contra, learned counsel

Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent, vehemently opposed the contentions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioners and argued that the scope of judicial review is limited in the matters of administrative decision making. It was contended that the Court while exercising writ jurisdiction can only consider the correctness of the decision making process and not the decision itself. While exercising its powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the Court cannot take it upon itself to actually ascertain the correctness of the disputed answer key, for the simple reason, that the Courts are not experts of the contested subject matter and therefore do not possess the requisite expertise to ascertain the correctness of the answer key.

Test Type	PAID
Total Words	510 Words
Words Per Minutes	120 WPM
Time	25 min