The existence of an alternative statutory remedy as has been consistently held by of inflexible the Courts is not a rule character nor is it an inviolable condition. The Courts vested with the power and jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India have always viewed this rule as a self-imposed restriction rather than a rule which is to be blindly adhered to and which brooks of no exception. Some of the well settled exceptions to the rule of a petitioner being relegated to an alternative remedy are where the principles of natural justice have been violated or where orders are made without jurisdiction.
| Test Type | PAID |
|---|---|
| Total Words | 553 Words |
| Words Per Minutes | 120 WPM |
| Time | 27 min |
Why Steno Architect Certification Training
Take the first step!
Kailash Chandra Vol. 21
Legal Dictations